Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates
📽️ Media
Featured picture candidates ![]() Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Adding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
|
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2025 at 14:30:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info (c/u/n) -- Eshaangirri (talk) 14:30, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Eshaangirri (talk) 14:30, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2025 at 12:14:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Italy
Info created by Argentieri.Andrea – uploaded by Argentieri.Andrea – nominated by Argentieri.Andrea -- Argentieri.Andrea (talk) 12:14, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Argentieri.Andrea (talk) 12:14, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Question I wonder. Is the wall tilted - or the photo? Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:27, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
- the wall is sloping, and also creates a sloping effect because it is wider at the base and narrower at the top. Argentieri.Andrea (talk) 13:40, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2025 at 04:49:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Netherlands
Info Aekingerzand Drents-Friese Wold National Park. Dead tree trunk beautifully situated in the clear water of a heathland ven. A soothing image for me.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:49, 8 September 2025 (UTC)Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:49, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:06, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2025 at 22:03:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#North Macedonia
Info created by Деан Лазаревски – uploaded by Kiril Simeonovski – nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:03, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:03, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support—UnpetitproleX (Talk) 00:01, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Interesting and instructive - definitely gives an idea of the structure and plan of such churches Cmao20 (talk) 13:04, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2025 at 21:04:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Religion#Christianity
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:04, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:04, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:58, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support—UnpetitproleX (Talk) 00:00, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice art and good quality + composition Cmao20 (talk) 13:02, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2025 at 13:46:51 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/In_their_habitats#Artiodactyla_(Even-toed_Ungulates)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:46, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:46, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 16:21, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 17:04, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Dreamlike atmosphere. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:51, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Usually, when photographs of this nature (pun intended) are nominated, they depict close-up shots of animals that more often than not take up the whole frame leaving little to no space for the environment to be visible but that's not the case with this image as the chital was shot from quite a distance allowing the viewer to take in the spectacular scenery around it. Wolverine X-eye 19:22, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:54, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Frank. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:00, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:39, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:59, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 23:59, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:15, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 14:36, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2025 at 12:46:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany
Info No FPs of this very interesting place. In my opinion the right angle has been chosen to make this subject appealing. created by Der Wolf im Wald – uploaded by Der Wolf im Wald – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:46, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:46, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 16:21, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Very impressive, good light and colours. I have seen good photos of the individual buildings on the Mathildenhöhe, but can’t remember a good photo showing the arrangement of buildings there; this is a successful one. – Aristeas (talk) 17:58, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:59, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:39, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:58, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support per Aristeas —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 23:58, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:55, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2025 at 12:34:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#India
Info Bags of organic fertiliser adorn newly-planted fields against a backdrop of the Western Catchment in the Nilgiri mountains in south India. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 12:34, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 12:34, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:17, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Oh yes, India and agriculture, two words synonymous with each other. Wolverine X-eye 19:29, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support I do wish these beautiful pastural scenes didn't have so many wires, but they seem to be unavoidable in rural India. In this instance, the wires don't feel like they detract too much to me. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:00, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492: True ... this is the downside of the success of rural electrification over the past 50+ years.
--Tagooty (talk) 05:11, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
- Definitely worth the trade! I know when I travelled through rural Indonesia, electrification was similarly worth the pylons and wires. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:50, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492: True ... this is the downside of the success of rural electrification over the past 50+ years.
Support very beautiful —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 23:57, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:55, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 14:37, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2025 at 07:45:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany
Info Walkway, courtyard of the Schwetzinger Garden Mosque, Schwetzingen Palace, Schwetzingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany; created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 07:45, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 07:45, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:35, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent! Really good to have a photo inside this mosque to compliment the exterior fps. Cmao20 (talk) 15:17, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:53, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2025 at 07:32:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Family_:_Turnicidae_(Buttonquails)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 07:32, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 07:32, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:35, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Comment I've added a possible crop. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:25, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
- Would you like me to crop it a little more? I can do that, but If you have recommended some specific crop how do I find it? Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 16:19, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
- Charles added an image note, which you should be able to see on the nomination page. It is your choice whether to do anything about it. Cmao20 (talk) 18:59, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, I have found it and cropped out some stone area from the frame. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 05:19, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
- Charles added an image note, which you should be able to see on the nomination page. It is your choice whether to do anything about it. Cmao20 (talk) 18:59, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent detail, harmonious colours. --Tagooty (talk) 12:42, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Entirely per Tagooty, great photo Cmao20 (talk) 15:09, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Current crop is fine. Yann (talk) 16:23, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 18:01, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:01, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support per Yann—UnpetitproleX (Talk) 00:02, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:52, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2025 at 21:44:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
Info The original church dates back to the fourth century, but the current Basilica of Aquileia was built in the eleventh century. Then, it was partially rebuilt again in the thirteenth century. Created, uploaded and nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 21:44, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 21:44, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support I like it. Ideally it would have been better without the people, but they do give a sense of scale. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:00, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:23, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:36, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Good composition, excellent detail. --Tagooty (talk) 12:45, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support and I like the people Cmao20 (talk) 15:08, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful light and colours, excellent view of the church. – Aristeas (talk) 18:00, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support The durability of these structures is quite impressive. Wolverine X-eye 19:31, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 00:03, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:52, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2025 at 17:05:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1940-1949
Info created by Unknown – uploaded by Joalpe – restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 17:05, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ezarateesteban 17:05, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose In spite of historical interest, quite small and I find the blurry bag and the strong shadows distracting Cmao20 (talk) 15:08, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2025 at 16:41:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Italy
Info Pescara is located in central Italy on the Adriatic Sea and enjoys a favorable microclimate thanks to its coastal location, which ensures balanced and pleasant temperatures. The proximity of the Apennines also favors ideal ventilation and humidity levels. Typical conditions are clear or partly cloudy, with north-northeast winds blowing at sea. This photo shows the town hall and the canal harbor on a sunny winter day, with the clearly visible mountains rising to 3,000 meters in the background. Created – uploaded – nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 16:41, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 16:41, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose not sharp at all, sorry --Ezarateesteban 17:31, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Composition is too busy, the subject is obscured. The writing on the tower is blurred. --Tagooty (talk) 12:48, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Am I looking at the same picture as everyone else?? This image is definitely sharp. I agree the writing on the tower isn't legible but I wouldn't expect it to be at this distance and angle. No quality issues visible and nice composition and light. Cmao20 (talk) 15:07, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Comment Actually, it's FoP...the author died less than 70 years ago [1]. The duration of economic rights for most works and for photographs in Italian law is 70 years from the death of the author (Art. 28). Where there are multiple authors, and for cinematographic works, the economic rights expire 70 years after the death of the last surviving author (Arts. 26, 32). For works in which the economic rights are owned by government, academies, public bodies, and non-profit cultural organizations, the duration of the economic rights is 20 years from the first publication (Art. 29). Nonetheless, under the Cultural Heritage Code, copyright on certain works is effectively eternal, including works that were made centuries before Italy had its first copyright law.--Caligolas (talk) 15:45, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2025 at 14:11:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Canada
Info The Shakespearean Gardens in Stratford, Ontario, were established in 1936 on the site of an old mill (the chimney of that mill remains prominent at the entrance). This image shows a bit deeper into the gardens, a gazebo surrounded by willows and flowerbeds; I think it offers a nice, serene scene. All by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:11, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:11, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ezarateesteban 17:25, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support That is so wonderful, wow!! Wolverine X-eye 19:14, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose It seems to me that the piece of path on the right side spoils the image. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 02:36, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose I agree with Екатерина Борисова. A viewpoint to the left to include the whole path might be better. --Tagooty (talk) 12:49, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support I honestly think the path is fine. It's all a compromise - if more were included on the right, the gazebo would be placed too centrally and the rest of the path is probably quite featureless, but if it were cropped to remove the path altogether, you'd lose the nice hanging branches on the willow. Plus I like the gentle curve of the path and how it frames the composition. Altogether I think this is a careful composition and should be FP. Cmao20 (talk) 15:05, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Very nice and painterly composition. Regarding the path, Cmao20 has perfectly explained the conundrum, so I think this was the best possible solution. – Aristeas (talk) 16:19, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose I agree with the others, but would suggest removing only the sunny part of the path (see note) and not the shadowy one. The brightness of it distracts more than the crop. —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 00:20, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Alternate crop
- Personally, my thoughts on the matter are similar to Cmao's in that the path provides a counterbalance to the flowerbeds and grass that reach beyond the frame to the left. However, I have prepared an alternate crop in case anyone wants to compare the two. Tagging Ezarate, Wolverine X-eye, Екатерина Борисова, Tagooty, Cmao20, Aristeas, and UnpetitproleX. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:18, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
- I probably made this page illegible to the bot with this addition. Please let me know. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:19, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
- My preference is for the original. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:14, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The original is better Cmao20 (talk) 12:01, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2025 at 08:57:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#North Macedonia
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:57, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:57, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose too much shadows and not wow factor --Ezarateesteban 17:34, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
- I think the geometry behind the shadowed and lit areas produces a nice artistic impression. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 00:31, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Sorry but agree with Ezarate. I'd like to see more of the context of the building rather than just the towers against a featureless blue sky. Quality is good but for me it's QI not FP Cmao20 (talk) 15:03, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:19, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2025 at 07:14:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Genus : Syncerus (African Buffalos)
Info African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) gazing in Lake Nakuru National Park, Kenya. The African buffalo is a very robust species. Its shoulder height can range from 1.0 to 1.7 m (3.3 to 5.6 ft) and its head-and-body length can range from 1.7 to 3.4 m (5.6 to 11.2 ft). Cape buffaloes weigh 425 to 870 kg (937 to 1,918 lb) (males weigh about 100 kg (220 lb) more than females). In comparison, African forest buffaloes, at 250 to 450 kg (600 to 1,000 lb), are only half that size. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 07:14, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 07:14, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:10, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:58, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Lupe (talk) 11:32, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:31, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:30, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 15:02, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 16:10, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:37, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:38, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose With the vegetation obscuring much of the animal, the image does not have the punch of the FPs in the gallery. --Tagooty (talk) 12:53, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
- Well, this is what they do most of the time Poco a poco (talk) 03:10, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Support agree partially with Tagooty, but with the image showing the buffalo in the midst of grazing, a bit of the obstruction is expected. Overall good enough to me. —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 00:14, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2025 at 06:33:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Rail vehicles#Switzerland
Info created by Kabelleger – uploaded by Kabelleger – nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 06:33, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Info Another of Kabelleger's train pictures, this one pulled by the distinctive "crocodile" locomotive. —Bruce1eetalk 06:33, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 06:33, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:10, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:58, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:30, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:29, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 15:01, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 17:38, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Awesome. Wolverine X-eye 19:18, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:25, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:37, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:39, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:53, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:50, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support—UnpetitproleX (Talk) 00:10, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2025 at 02:07:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Nymphaeaceae
Info created by Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação – uploaded by Luiz79 – nominated by MrNinja -- MrNinja (talk) 02:07, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Nice, serene composition but sorry, not enough sharpness/image quality for FP Cmao20 (talk) 12:29, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2025 at 02:12:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
Info created by and uploaded by Harshit SR – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:12, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:12, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:58, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:28, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:08, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:27, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:47, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:36, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:53, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:54, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:04, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Motif is wowing, but technical quality is below the FP-standards. There are too much artefacts and noise in the sky. --Milseburg (talk) 21:08, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
- @Milseburg: I have removed the artefacts and dust spots and denoised the sky, please see. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 03:11, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2025 at 17:19:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Dicruridae_(Drongos)
Info (I could not find the family Dicruridae in Passeriformes, thats why I have added Passeriformes in the gallery section). All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 17:19, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 17:19, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
- You should create an empty section for family Dicruridae where your image will go on promotion. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:12, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
- Done. Cmao20 (talk) 01:27, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:34, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
- Done. Cmao20 (talk) 01:27, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support I like the curve of the branch in this one Cmao20 (talk) 01:28, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:14, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Neutral - a tighter crop, similar to addded note, that takes out the distracting dark blemish on the left side and presents a tighter view of this species, would strengthen the image. --GRDN711 (talk) 03:51, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, I have cropped out that part. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:31, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:10, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:26, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Insufficient detail for an FP of a perched bird. --Tagooty (talk) 12:58, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2025 at 16:28:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Historical#1850-1899
Info created by Roger Fenton – uploaded by Yann and JayCubby – nominated by JayCubby -- JayCubby (talk) 16:28, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
- This is the version of the photo which has had cannonballs moved into the road for dramatic effect. JayCubby (talk) 22:27, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Info See previous nom, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Valley of the shadow of death.jpg
Support -- JayCubby (talk) 16:28, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 16:50, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:10, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, That is on my TODO list, but it needs more restoration. Yann (talk) 14:53, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
- Would you like me to withdraw? JayCubby (talk) 18:54, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
- Well if you can complete the restoration soon, then fine. I will see what I can do tomorrow, but there is a lot of work. That's why I didn't nominate it yet. Yann (talk) 19:29, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
- I went after the dust at the edges, but I don't think it's worth going after every foreground speckle.
- The PSD is at https://files.catbox.moe/pip2nh.psd. JayCubby (talk) 22:36, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
- Well if you can complete the restoration soon, then fine. I will see what I can do tomorrow, but there is a lot of work. That's why I didn't nominate it yet. Yann (talk) 19:29, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
- Would you like me to withdraw? JayCubby (talk) 18:54, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Comment It also needs a better description, see Fotojournalismus#Ethische_Aspekte_des_Fotojournalismus. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:09, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, I've added a note. JayCubby (talk) 22:27, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support I did more restoration. I also fixed the contrast. Yann (talk) 16:36, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2025 at 12:20:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Italy
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 12:20, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 12:20, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:21, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 16:51, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:14, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:11, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:06, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Marvelous. Wolverine X-eye 19:17, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Question: Is the WB off? JayCubby (talk) 22:19, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2025 at 10:14:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Paradoxornithidae (Parrotbills)
Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Kelly zhrm -- Kelly zhrm (talk) 10:14, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kelly zhrm (talk) 10:14, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Slightly oversharpened, but good. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:44, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:25, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:20, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Comment Not Corvidae Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:49, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
- Good catch Charlesjsharp, done. Kelly zhrm in future it is always acceptable to ask for help on correct gallery if unsure. Cmao20 (talk) 23:51, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 16:36, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:45, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 19:51, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:14, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:11, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:39, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 09:12, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poco a poco (talk • contribs) 13:23, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:20, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 15:03, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:48, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:57, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:34, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:52, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:39, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:51, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2025 at 10:05:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#India
Info Fields and hazy mountains in early morning light, Nilgiri mountains near Ooty, south India. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 10:05, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support On an early morning walk, the juxtaposition of bright green recently-sown fields and hazy mountains in the distance caught my attention. -- Tagooty (talk) 10:05, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:17, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:15, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:11, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:19, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:05, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support: Yofi! By the way Tagooty, do you have the GPS coordinates? JayCubby (talk) 22:17, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Done @JayCubby: Geotag added. --Tagooty (talk) 04:22, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:34, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:40, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:52, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:39, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Another agricultural image in the same area (South India). Wolverine X-eye 19:37, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2025 at 10:03:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
Info Aerial image of the Schwetzingen Palace showing the unique layout of the main parterre of the palace gardens as a full circle; created, uploaded and nominated by Carsten Steger -- Carsten Steger (talk) 10:03, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Carsten Steger (talk) 10:03, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:16, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 16:36, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:45, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 19:53, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:45, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:15, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:11, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 09:13, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice Poco a poco (talk) 13:24, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:17, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:33, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:51, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:38, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Very useful and educative. – Aristeas (talk) 16:17, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2025 at 08:49:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#France
Info created by S. DÉNIEL – uploaded by S. DÉNIEL – nominated by S. DÉNIEL -- S. DÉNIEL (talk) 08:49, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- S. DÉNIEL (talk) 08:49, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose - Sorry, but there's no clear focus on the image, as non the bastion nor the bridge are clearly visible, and the composition doesn't help. -Theklan (talk) 09:38, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support I like the square composition and the choice to contrast the modern bridge with the old chateau. The light is a bit dull but this is still FP for me. Cmao20 (talk) 13:15, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose I like the contrast very much but I also think it is a bit too cluttered and lacks balance. Sorry. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:18, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support A very concise epitome of Brest, juxtaposing old and new Brest, the pictureque turret from the Château and the immense bridge and high-rise buildings in one image, united by their the common denominator, the water of the Penfeld, which has prompted the origin of the harbour and hence of the whole town of Brest. – Aristeas (talk) 10:19, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2025 at 04:50:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Sapindaceae
Info Ripening seeds of a Viburnum plicatum which change color from green to red. Focus stack of 44 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:50, 5 September 2025 (UTC)Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:50, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Comment Blurring along top and left of one seed (see image note). Otherwise, an excellent focus-stacked image. --Tagooty (talk) 06:44, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
- @Tagooty:
Done. Correction. Thank you for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 09:05, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tagooty (talk) 09:17, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:25, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:13, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 16:50, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:44, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:46, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:18, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:11, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:25, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:39, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support A well-taken image in my opinion. Wolverine X-eye 19:20, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:25, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:32, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:00, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:51, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2025 at 18:28:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Work#Others
Info created by Marinha do Brasil (Oficial) – uploaded and nominated by me -- heylenny (talk/edits) 18:28, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- heylenny (talk/edits) 18:28, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support, but the file name could be more descriptive. JayCubby (talk) 00:10, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
- Can I request a rename while in FPC? heylenny (talk/edits) 00:26, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
- It’s difficult, heylenny, because it easily breaks the nomination. Tell me a good new filename, and I can handle the renaming for you. – Aristeas (talk) 09:22, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
- What about "Architects of the Brazilian Navy at Esplanada dos Ministérios"? Also, the two similar ones could be renamed. heylenny (talk/edits) 17:05, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
- It’s difficult, heylenny, because it easily breaks the nomination. Tell me a good new filename, and I can handle the renaming for you. – Aristeas (talk) 09:22, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
- Can I request a rename while in FPC? heylenny (talk/edits) 00:26, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Neutral - the image is great, but I don't think that it represents what an architect does. -Theklan (talk) 09:40, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
- Well, they're military architects from the Brazilian Navy, but don't think there is a difference from 'regular architects.' In Brazil, we have professions in both the civilian and military. For example, we have both military and civil police, as well as fire departments. heylenny (talk/edits) 17:52, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:55, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 06:36, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:12, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Neutral Quality is good but the compo (background, bottom crop, result overall) is not really exciting Poco a poco (talk) 13:27, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
- While the quality is good, this looks way too much like a staged picture. Yann (talk) 15:05, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
- Agreed, too staged, and thus more modelling than architecture. (As such nothing wrong with that, and this would be a good illustration of a posed modelling picture, though as Poco notes above not the best in that category).
Weak oppose from me, sorry. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 03:26, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
- Of course it's staged. They're literally posing for the photo. What's wrong with that? heylenny (talk/edits) 03:59, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
- Agreed, too staged, and thus more modelling than architecture. (As such nothing wrong with that, and this would be a good illustration of a posed modelling picture, though as Poco notes above not the best in that category).
- Well I suppose the question - and the reason I still haven't voted on the picture - is what do we learn from this photograph that is interesting, enlightening, or original? For a picture to become featued it needs to be outstanding in a specific scope. That doesn't have to be illustrative, it can be artistic too - we have promoted some great photographic art - but I need to have a clear idea of what the picture contributes to the project and what it is trying to achieve. I don't really have that here. I still don't know who these people are, what they are doing here, what the plans they are looking at are, what if anything they have to do with the buildings in the background etc. So the picture doesn't really illustrate anything. At best it is a publicity photo for the Brazilian navy, or for job recruitment or something similar. Is that really within the scope of outstanding content Commons should be promoting? What does it really add to the FP galleries? Cmao20 (talk) 12:29, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2025 at 17:50:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Tringa
Info Lesser yellowlegs (Tringa flavipes). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 17:50, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 17:50, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:57, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:23, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -Theklan (talk) 09:40, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kelly zhrm (talk) 10:04, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 10:15, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:23, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:26, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:12, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 16:39, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:43, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 19:56, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:20, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:12, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Ok Poco a poco (talk) 13:29, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:38, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:58, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:32, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:59, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:50, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Aellopos fadus
Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2025 at 17:03:19 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page
-
Aellopos fadus (male) - Two views of same. Collection of the Mathematician Laurent Schwartz. Manicoré, Amazonas, Brasil.
-
Aellopos fadus (female) - Two views of same. Collection of the Mathematician Laurent Schwartz. Rio Veruellio, Amazonas (Brazilian state).
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera/Sphingidae#Genus : Aellopos
Info created and uploaded by Archaeodontosaurus – nominated by MrNinja -- MrNinja (talk) 17:03, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- Gallery fixed. Will you please learn to fix the correct one for your noms. --Cart (talk) 17:38, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, sorry. I'm still a beginner in this image naming process. MrNinja (talk) 03:20, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
- Gallery fixed. Will you please learn to fix the correct one for your noms. --Cart (talk) 17:38, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Thank you for this nomination --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:26, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:41, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your support! Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:23, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your support! Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:00, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your support! Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -Theklan (talk) 09:40, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 10:13, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:22, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:54, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:43, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:12, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:36, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support for the set. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:59, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:31, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:50, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2025 at 16:58:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#France
Info Elegant composition capturing a cobbled street in France at night. No FPs from this place (indeed would be only the third from this department of France). created by Superbass – uploaded by Superbass – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:58, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:58, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support - Very nice composition! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:06, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:30, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:06, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 18:34, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:24, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 00:00, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:13, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:59, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Wow! -- Radomianin (talk) 06:21, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- -donald- (talk) 07:32, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful, and a very good example for the picturesque lanes of towns and villages in the Bretagne. – Aristeas (talk) 09:20, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -Theklan (talk) 09:41, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 10:16, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:11, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:21, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 16:40, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 16:50, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 17:23, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:42, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 19:57, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:21, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:13, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:35, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:01, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — ERcheck (talk). 20:18, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support JayCubby (talk) 22:14, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:31, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:49, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2025 at 15:09:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
Info I've always had interest in Minoru Yamasaki's designs and his firm's involvement in Michigan. Captured this image with my drone during a recent trip to Detroit. All by WMrapids. -- WMrapids (talk) 15:09, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- WMrapids (talk) 15:09, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- Love it, but it's a bit soft. Any way to sharpen? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:15, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- Ok, I sharpened it some. How does that look? Thanks Chris! WMrapids (talk) 15:33, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:07, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:25, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:59, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support The combination of symmetry (buildings, foreground) and asymmetry (sky, landscape) plus the illusion that we can “look through” the buildings (because of the sky reflection in the windows) make this image very attractive. – Aristeas (talk) 09:18, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -Theklan (talk) 09:41, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 10:18, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:20, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:25, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent Cmao20 (talk) 13:09, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 16:49, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:42, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:02, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 19:59, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:21, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:13, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:34, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:02, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support exactly as per Aisteas. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:00, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:30, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:49, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2025 at 12:55:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Cuculidae (Cuckoos)
Info Ani with a stick to build its nest. The nest is built by several pairs of anis and more than one female will lay eggs in the communal nest. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:55, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:55, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:05, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:18, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cool! Wolverine X-eye 17:48, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support JayCubby (talk) 18:09, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 18:35, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:26, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:13, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Good composition --Tagooty (talk) 06:46, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:15, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 10:19, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:16, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:25, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:08, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:41, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:03, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:00, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:23, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:13, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:30, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:32, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2025 at 23:19:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Food and drink#Meals (food_and_drink)
Info Thought I'd have a go at a food FPC (well, I have another I'm trying to muster up the courage to nominate). I bring you: chilaquiles, a traditional Mexican breakfast dish that consists of tortilla triangles doused in salsa (red, in this instance) and served with shredded meat. In this instance, it came with a fried egg and some feta cheese. All by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:19, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:19, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 23:54, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Love it Cmao20 (talk) 11:54, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support looks yummy. --MB-one (talk) 14:54, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:09, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 18:35, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Appetising, but not an FP to me. The colours of the food and the table are too similar, and the uneven lighting make it below the bar in the Gallery. --Tagooty (talk) 06:51, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:18, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:25, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:03, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:13, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:48, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Support I would have cropped just a hair more on the right, but good enough. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 03:28, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
- I'd been thinking that myself. Done, and should be minor enough that there isn't a need to tag everyone. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:22, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2025 at 21:51:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Brazil
Info created by Felipe Valduga – uploaded by High source – nominated by Heylenny -- heylenny (talk/edits) 21:51, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- heylenny (talk/edits) 21:51, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:20, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support I have added better categories. Others may be able to think of more, though. Cmao20 (talk) 11:54, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! heylenny (talk/edits) 17:36, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:09, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Quality is fine but I miss any elements here that make the compo interesting. Sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 18:12, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:26, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:34, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per Poco a poco --Tagooty (talk) 06:48, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Well done. For me the “wow” is in the pattern-link quality of this night cityscape: the almost even distribution of higher and lower buildings, lights and shadows results in a pattern which tells me much about how we build our cities. – Aristeas (talk) 09:14, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:14, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 16:41, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:14, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:48, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2025 at 19:30:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Strigidae_(True_Owls)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:30, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:30, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent! This would also be our first FP of this species. Cmao20 (talk) 20:31, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:20, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:29, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:27, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:15, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:06, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 18:36, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:26, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Colours and composition --Tagooty (talk) 06:52, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- -donald- (talk) 07:33, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:07, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -Theklan (talk) 09:42, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 10:20, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:12, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:25, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:40, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:03, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 20:02, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:14, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:31, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:31, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cool looking bird. Wolverine X-eye 19:24, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:03, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2025 at 17:35:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Chaetodontidae (Butterflyfishes)
Info Three species of butterfly fish and another fish. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:35, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:35, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:35, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 20:34, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:21, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 23:46, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:28, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:14, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 18:37, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:27, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support. I've tagged a dust (?) spot. JayCubby (talk) 00:25, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
- It's a fish! Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:41, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:10, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:25, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 16:49, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:39, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:04, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 20:02, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:14, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Pleasant view.--Terragio67 (talk) 17:30, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:03, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
File:Lago Coldai 6.jpg, featured
Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2025 at 06:54:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Veneto
Info created, uploaded & nominated by kallerna —kallerna (talk) 06:54, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Lake Coldai & Civetta, epic view from the Dolomites. We're very small. —kallerna (talk) 06:54, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support I think, from the 7 perspectives this one is the best. -- -donald- (talk) 07:53, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support This image rather shows the mountain than the lake, so its title is not optimal. But very fine image indeed. --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:02, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:45, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:01, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Milseburg (talk) 14:07, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Huge wow Cmao20 (talk) 18:35, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 06:10, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:52, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:28, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:44, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:14, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:05, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:18, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:06, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 10:22, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:25, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 20:14, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:19, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:21, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:27, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:34, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:03, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
File:Least sandpiper (03342).jpg, featured
Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2025 at 21:56:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Calidris
Info Least sandpiper (Calidris minutilla), smallest shorebird in the world. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 21:56, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 21:56, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:14, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:01, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Another least sandpiper was recently promoted to FP. This one is much better in terms of detail, colour, and pose. --Tagooty (talk) 12:53, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you. I was so excited last week, when I came home from the muddy marsh with the best shots of a least sandpiper and semipalmated plover I've ever managed to take, and then saw Stephan nominated wonderful photos of exactly those two species! :) Figured I might as well nominate anyway, since they're a bit different. — Rhododendrites talk | 17:56, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:34, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 23:47, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Strong support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:55, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:28, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:43, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent image --MB-one (talk) 14:56, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:13, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Great details all the way down to the wet beak and damp feathers near it. Well done.--WMrapids (talk) 15:39, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 18:38, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support per WMrapids. – IMHO the pose in Stephan’s photo is equally good, it’s great to have two complementary FPs of this species. – Aristeas (talk) 09:05, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 10:23, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:25, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:38, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 20:03, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:19, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:25, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:34, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:04, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2025 at 07:06:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Serbia
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:06, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:06, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:57, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:52, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:18, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:00, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Nice building and good quality, but light is too dull in my eyes for FP. --Milseburg (talk) 14:14, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support The building is more or less centered and I can't say there's much wrong with the technical quality, so with that said, I don't see a reason for me to not vote in favor of this candidate. Wolverine X-eye 15:02, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support heylenny (talk/edits) 03:51, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:34, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Milseburg --MB-one (talk) 14:55, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:10, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support The light is not flashy, right, but it nicely models the structure of the façade and its sculptures, and the sky with its clouds adds some silent drama to the view. Therefore the photo has a beautiful mood and is IMHO more artistic than the usual view with blue sky + full sun. – Aristeas (talk) 09:01, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:20, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2025 at 05:52:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class : Bivalvia
Info Maxima clam (Tridacna maxima), Zanzibar, Tanzania. This species is found in the oceans surrounding East Africa, India, China, Australia, Southeast Asia, the Red Sea, and the islands of the Pacific. As other bivalves have two valves on the mantle. These siphon water through the body to extract oxygen from the water using the gills and to feed on algae. They are much sought after in the aquarium trade, as their often striking coloration mimics that of the true giant clam; however, the maximas maintain a manageable size (only one third their size), with the shells of large specimens typically not exceeding 20 centimetres (7.9 in). Note: I'm proposing this image to FP after the discussion here. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 05:52, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 05:52, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support per my comments on the linked discussion Cmao20 (talk) 11:37, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:58, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:35, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:09, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:33, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:32, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:20, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2025 at 18:50:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Varanidae (Monitor Lizards and Komodo dragon)
Info created by Mfalhajji – uploaded by Mfalhajji – nominated by روتانا -- Rotana🦋 (talk) 18:50, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Rotana🦋 (talk) 18:50, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support But please, add proper categories about the displayed species Poco a poco (talk) 19:55, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
- Rotana🦋 as above, species category please. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:44, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 21:40, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:27, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:49, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:09, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Great capture -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:29, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:28, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Will support when proper species identification is made but this should not pass with the categories 'unidentified monitor lizard' and 'unidentified uromastyx' and I'm surprised so many people are willing to support it without any clarity as to the species. Cmao20 (talk) 11:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Comment Gallery fixed, at least we know the family and I went with the more visible one, as it can only be in one gallery. However if this is featured, you can place it in several FP categories. I also agree with the request for better identification. It's really down-heartening to see how many voters don't care about correct info and documentation of nominated images. FPC shouldn't be a place where you just go to "♥like" photos. --Cart (talk) 12:52, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:10, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support A big bite for the lizard! --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:07, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:39, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support-- Mohammed Qays 🗣 04:59, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support but agree with Cmao20 about the identification, and thanks to Cart for her work. It should be easy to fully identify at least one of these animals. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:39, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:04, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:21, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:05, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2025 at 12:36:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1940-1949
Info created by Dorothea Lange, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
Info Near Coolidge, Arizona, November 1940. Migratory cotton picker with his cotton sack slung over his shoulder rests at the scales before returning to work in the field.
Support This picture was on the cover of The Bitter Years exhibition book at the Museum of Modern Art, New York. It is clearly one of the masterpiece of the exhibition. Taken by Dorothea Lange, the same photographer who created the famous Migrant Mother picture. Contrary to all others of this exhibition, this picture is not available in the Library of Congress website, so the resolution is much less than others. Nevertheless, it is still very good. -- Yann (talk) 12:36, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Comment Yes; and so often you see it cropped unlike here. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:49, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:43, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:27, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose -- This may be a Dorthea Lange, but IHMO a portrait with a hand covering the face does not make a great picture. MisawaSakura (talk) 22:54, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
- @MisawaSakura: Her name is Dorothea Lange. Please be careful of the spelling. Actually the hand gesture is what makes this special. Yann (talk) 11:34, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- I simply don't agree. MisawaSakura (talk) 11:39, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- Art is subjective (even famous art) and of course you don't have to like it but a 'humble opinion' would not be an oppose vote. You might not like capuchin monkeys or white-eyes either, but I wouldn't expect an oppose vote on that basis.! Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:07, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
. FWIW Yann, there's a higher res image at here. Slightly cropped. JayCubby (talk) 00:26, 2 September 2025 (UTC)Support
- Ah nice. Yann (talk) 11:34, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:45, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ezarateesteban 12:09, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:47, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- @Charlesjsharp, Radomianin, The Cosmonaut, MisawaSakura, JayCubby, Cmao20, Ezarate, and Agnes Monkelbaan: I uploaded a new restoration, based on the HR version linked by JayCubby. That print was very dirty. There are fingerprints allover. The negative was damaged, and there was some tentative to fix it with a pencil in a crude way. All fixed. What do you think? Yann (talk) 17:31, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- New version is better --Ezarateesteban 19:01, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support both, with a preference for the new version. JayCubby (talk) 17:48, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- And great job with the restoration! JayCubby (talk) 17:49, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- New version. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:00, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
- I really like the new version, Yann - thank you for the careful restoration! -- Radomianin (talk) 19:42, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:11, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 12:52, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:40, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 14:59, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:21, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:16, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:33, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2025 at 11:22:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Tools
Info created by Didier Descouens – uploaded by Archaeodontosaurus – nominated by Theklan -- Theklan (talk) 11:22, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Theklan (talk) 11:22, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Thank you for this nomination. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:12, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:10, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:15, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:37, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:40, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 14:59, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:21, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:13, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2025 at 00:14:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo_techniques/Styles_and_Techniques#Others
Info: happy September! I propose this photo as a good example of high-contrast photography technique, of which we currently have no FPs. Several types of contrast are present here: aside from the obvious brightly illuminated leaf counterbalanced by the dark leaf shadows, the deep red of the maple leaf pops against the neutral white and gray tones of the birch bark. Additionally, the smoothness of the birch bark contrasts with the veiny, detailed texture of the leaf. All by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:14, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:14, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice composition but I suppose the photography technique should be mentioned in the description and a category needs to be added. -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:49, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
- thank you;
Done --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:00, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
- thank you;
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:41, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support It's a shame I can only vote once. ;-) A wonderful photo. --XRay 💬 14:42, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 18:26, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:17, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:09, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:35, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Good motif, but the shadow across the bottom of the leaf spoils it for me. --Tagooty (talk) 13:02, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Impressive, and the strong shadows allow for allegorical interpretations. – Aristeas (talk) 07:55, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:35, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:22, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2025 at 00:15:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Tower_Bridge,_London
Info: while we have plenty of FPs of the bridge already, I believe this photo, with its special light and angle, adds something to the collection. All by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:15, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:15, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
- I like it. I'm wondering if having the titular towers equidistant from the edge of the frame would be better composition, though. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:17, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
- Ah, yes, I thought I had already centred it;
Done. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:32, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
- Ah, yes, I thought I had already centred it;
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:53, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Cool bridge. Wolverine X-eye 17:10, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support MisawaSakura (talk) 22:55, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:14, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Neutral For me it's too dark. I know, golden hour, but the shadows could be lighter. -- -donald- (talk) 11:15, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Better now. -- -donald- (talk) 14:28, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Sorry but my instinct is that this picture is underexposed and although it is good, I don't think it stands out amongst the other photos we have of this very common subject on Commons. Cmao20 (talk) 11:42, 2 September 2025 (UTC)Weak oppose
- New version is definitely better. Cmao20 (talk) 14:07, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Done @Crisco 1492, Wolverine X-eye, MisawaSakura, MZaplotnik, -donald-, and Cmao20: lifted shadows and brightened overall. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:02, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 14:42, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:10, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:33, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Prominent motif, I'm bothered by the shadow on the lower right tower. --Milseburg (talk) 14:18, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:52, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:22, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2025 at 18:47:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Equidae_(Equids)
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 18:47, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 18:47, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but the crop is unpleasant, at least in my eyes. Wolverine X-eye 16:51, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:38, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:09, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Too much grass in front and awkward crop. --Tagooty (talk) 13:04, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 16:43, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2025 at 18:40:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Fagales#Family_:_Betulaceae
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 18:40, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 18:40, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:16, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support Pleasant and satisfying composition Cmao20 (talk) 12:56, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Agree, it's pleasant but it isn't enough IMHO for FP, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 19:53, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful typical August shot.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:09, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --Milseburg (talk) 14:20, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support I like the contrasting colours and the details --imehling (talk) 20:29, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Comment The unsharp circle (see annotation) should be coreccted --Llez (talk) 14:57, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Done Interesting. I think it was a dew drop. The spot is fixed now. --XRay 💬 17:17, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 16:45, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 08:19, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:22, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2025 at 15:33:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Film
Info created by Unknown – uploaded by Fæ – restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 15:33, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ezarateesteban 15:33, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Comment Seems to be some significant bleeding, especially on the viewer's right side of the poster. Do we have any other versions to compare? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:18, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
- I restored from original, seems to be the unique source in internet --Ezarateesteban 22:30, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
- Huh, they were using black paper to prevent bleeding. I suspect the contrast and levels editing during the restoration process brought out something that wasn't intended to be there. Worth doing a new layer, 50% opacity, of the white/cream colour (limited only to areas that are that colour, of course) to offset the bleedthrough? Similar to what I did to remove JPG artefacting at File:Jaws movie poster.jpg. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:28, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
- I restored from original, seems to be the unique source in internet --Ezarateesteban 22:30, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
- I don't know, I'll investigate how to do it during week, if you or anyone desire to help, feel free to do, here is TIFF restored to work over it --Ezarateesteban 21:38, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
- Sure. I'll have a go at it. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:42, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
- Okay, so I've reduced the prominence of the red bleed-through on the TIF and the JPG. I saved the TIF with layers so you can see what I did (assuming Commons will store the layer data separately). — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:05, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you!!! Ezarateesteban
- The TIF file hasn't any layers, a pitty that Commons doesn't store layers --Ezarateesteban 22:15, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
- Oh. It's got the size for the extra layer. :/ — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:31, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
- The TIF file hasn't any layers, a pitty that Commons doesn't store layers --Ezarateesteban 22:15, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
- @Ezarate, Commons supports XCF (FOSS equivalent of PSD) files. JayCubby (talk) 19:36, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Support - What's left looks worse at thumb than it really is. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:31, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Hint about vote formatting
|
---|
|
Support JayCubby (talk) 16:08, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:47, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
File:Алматы, ТГМ6д-0273 на станции Аэродром (6).jpg, not featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2025 at 07:41:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Rail vehicles#Kazakhstan
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 07:41, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Красный wanna talk? 07:41, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support I like this a lot - the light, the colours, the smoke. Image quality is good. Cmao20 (talk) 13:54, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose I do like the image and it's technically good. But for me, that is not quite enough for it to be featured. Maybe it's the light, maybe the shrub on the right side. --MB-one (talk) 20:34, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:07, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Sorry, but I agree Poco a poco (talk) 19:50, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 16:46, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Maybe trees on the left side are a bit too bright, but I like the composition and quite a vivid impression of the movement. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 02:41, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Wed 03 Sep → Mon 08 Sep Thu 04 Sep → Tue 09 Sep Fri 05 Sep → Wed 10 Sep Sat 06 Sep → Thu 11 Sep Sun 07 Sep → Fri 12 Sep Mon 08 Sep → Sat 13 Sep
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Sat 30 Aug → Mon 08 Sep Sun 31 Aug → Tue 09 Sep Mon 01 Sep → Wed 10 Sep Tue 02 Sep → Thu 11 Sep Wed 03 Sep → Fri 12 Sep Thu 04 Sep → Sat 13 Sep Fri 05 Sep → Sun 14 Sep Sat 06 Sep → Mon 15 Sep Sun 07 Sep → Tue 16 Sep Mon 08 Sep → Wed 17 Sep
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag featured or not featured – for example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the com-nom parameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:
== Set Promoted to FP ==
<gallery>
File:XXXXXX.jpg
File:XXXXXX.jpg
</gallery>
{{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}}, using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY. - Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator. - Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/September 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
{{FPC-delist-results-reviewed|delist=x|keep=x|neutral=x|delisted=yes/no|sig=~~~~}}
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Ensifera ensifera (22271195865).jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/September 2025.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes). If the image description page uses the old {{Featured picture}} template, replace it by {{Assessments|featured=2}}.
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture must not be removed from the chronological list.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}}
- Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/September 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.